A comparison of the use of insecticides and chemical weapons and the weapons of mass destruction

Nonetheless, it is now possible to develop large quantities of highly toxic chemicals that can be dispersed over great distances in a way that will kill large populations. In other words, they would be designed to "have consequences far outweighing the size and effectiveness of the weapons themselves".

Later the Romans and Persians used the same tactics. Inhowever, President Richard Nixon announced the U. At that time these high-flying battleships of the air seemed to pose an unstoppable threat to civilian centres located far from any war front—as indeed they did during World War II —45notably in the firebombings of such cities as Hamburg, Germany, and Tokyo, Japan, when tens of thousands of civilians died in a single night.

Between and more than 72 million liter herbicides were distributed over South Viet Nam [37], thereof more than 44 million liter were the defoliant agent orange, containing about kg dioxin.

It is both an incendiary and the best-known producer of vivid white smoke. Unfortunately, this system operates with very limited financial resources and depends upon voluntary reporting and contributions by member states. Many categories of weapons are prohibited by specific treaties and declarations that form part of international law.

In modern warfare, chemical weapons were first used in World War I —18during which gas warfare inflicted more than one million of the casualties suffered by combatants in that conflict and killed an estimated 90, Biological weapons contain natural toxins or infectious agents such as bacteria, viruses, or fungi; sprayed or burst over populated areas, they might cause limited but severe outbreaks of such deadly diseases as anthraxpneumonic plagueor smallpox.

While much remains to be accomplished, the Chemical Weapons Treaty marks a major milestone in terms of progress toward demilitarization. One canister may contain 50 bomblets, oror even as many as 4, depending on the model, and may cover a ground area from to meters in diameter.

The incidence of a particular type of cancer depends on how the radiation exposure occurs. There are growing concerns, though, about the likelihood of future use of biological weapons in light of the dynamism of biomedical technology and advances in the field of biotechnology.

The unnecessary suffering and superfluous harm that they have caused, on the two occasions they have been used, dwarf the human toll attributable to chemical weapons in all conflicts over many centuries. No matter what lies ahead, we all benefit by increasing funding and international partnerships to improve our ability to quickly identify and alert relevant public health authorities to new disease outbreaks wherever they occur around the globe.

A few developed countries may already be capable to overcome these hurdles [47]. Such an agent must be relatively resistant to atmospheric water and oxygen so that it does not lose its effect when dispersed.

While the mass killing of human beings is not a new feature of warfare, weapons of mass destruction WMD pose an unprecedented constellation of challenges to peace and security. Aum sprayed botulinum toxin over Tokyo several times inand conducted similar activities with anthrax spores inbut without any known effects.

Signatories of the Convention renounce their right to engage in military preparations for offensive biological warfare, regardless of whether they are faced with a similar threat. The variety of weapons to be destroyed, daunting technical challenges, program management issues, and community concerns over public health and environmental risks have contributed to delayed progress.

Widespread public horror over the use of chemical weaponry as well as fears of retaliation in kind have, at least some degree, curbed the use of chemical weapons.

These changes are likely to contribute to conditions that facilitate the rapid spread of infectious disease. Depleted Uranium DU [31], which draw a lot of public attention in the recent decade, is a by-product of enriching natural uranium — increasing the proportion of the U atom which is the only form of uranium that can sustain a nuclear reaction and is used in nuclear reactors or nuclear weapons.

As former Secretary of Defense William J. These include choking agents, blister agents, blood agents, nerve agents, incapacitants, riot-control agents, and herbicides.

Weapon of mass destruction

For a comprehensive listing of the characteristics of known chemical agents, see the Centers for Disease Control CDC website which provides information on characteristics and related resources, including emergency preparedness, surveillance, and response: The fear reached a crescendo with the Iraq disarmament crisis and the alleged existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that became the primary justification for the invasion of Iraq ; however, American forces found none in Iraq.

All told, we face a truly transnational threat of unknown dimensions that we are currently ill-suited to address. The question can be asked if DU is mainly a chemical, or a radiological weapon? Some people may even have natural immunity to a biological agent.

As a result, the Biological Weapons Convention BWC bans the development, stockpiling, transfer, and use of biological weapons worldwide. This article provides results from computer simulation for dispersion of chemical and biological agents under various atmospheric conditions and their impact parameters on human health.

In a July decision regarding the legitimacy of nuclear weapons, for example, the World Court took a formal position on the issue, finding that there is no justification for the first-use of nuclear weapons.

Any such warfare would be directed primarily against the civilian population. By way of comparison, brick houses and human lungs can be crushed at about 30 psi pressure or less.

Over the course of World War II and during the Cold War, major powers developed enormous arsenals of chemical weapons that included large quantities of a more lethal variety of so-called nerve gas. Only in was the statute amended to extend the prohibition on the use of such weapons to non-international armed conflicts.

History of Biological Weapons Over the centuries, biowarfare has existed in many forms: This is the same reaction that occurs in the center of the sun.chemical weapons, reportedly including stocks of nerve (sarin, VX) and blister (mustard gas) agents, and their potential use.

For analysis of chemical weapons possession and use in Syria, see CRS Report R, Syria’s Chemical Weapons: Issues for Congress, coordinated by Mary Beth D.


Nikitin. While the mass killing of human beings is not a new feature of warfare, weapons of mass destruction (WMD) pose an unprecedented constellation of challenges to peace and security. Over the past century, various states have built and stockpiled lethal arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the materials to produce them.

Weapon of mass destruction (WMD), weapon with the capacity to inflict death and destruction on such a massive scale and so indiscriminately that its very presence in the hands of a hostile power can be considered a grievous killarney10mile.com weapons of mass destruction are either nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons—frequently referred to collectively as NBC weapons.

Among the Weapons of Mass Destruction, chemical warfare (CW) is probably one of the most brutal created by mankind in comparison with biological and nuclear warfare.

Chemical weapons are inexpensive and are relatively easy to produce, even by small terrorist groups, to create mass casualties with small quantities. The FBI's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Directorate uses a cohesive and coordinated approach to incidents involving nuclear, radiological, biological, or chemical weapons—with an overriding.

Like nuclear weapons and biological weapons, chemical weapons are often classified as weapons of mass killarney10mile.com the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) ofthe use of chemical weapons in war is prohibited, as is all development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, and transfer of such weapons.

Nevertheless, while the aim of the CWC is complete elimination of most types of chemical.

A comparison of the use of insecticides and chemical weapons and the weapons of mass destruction
Rated 5/5 based on 10 review